NCAA Tournament March Madness

#107 SF Austin

Bubble Watch | Bracketology

Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?


Projection: need to automatically qualify

SF Austin’s profile is built on a handful of meaningful road wins and a clear pattern of inconsistency that leaves the résumé vulnerable: the team has flashed its best form with solid victories away at Rice and Pepperdine and a statement home result against Arkansas St, but those high points are balanced by damaging losses on the road at Fresno St and in conference play at UT Arlington and McNeese St that undercut the quality of the overall body of work. The offense has struggled to impose itself away from familiar surroundings while the defense has kept games within reach, which explains why neutral and true road performances matter far more than the home wins over conference opponents like Northwestern LA and SE Louisiana. With the remainder of the schedule offering multiple chances to repair the narrative — including road swings to New Orleans, Nicholls St and Lamar, a tricky trip back to McNeese St and home opportunities against teams such as Incarnate Word and Houston Christian — the committee will be watching how SF Austin responds, valuing road and neutral success and penalizing any additional bad losses.

Date Opponent Ranking Outcome
11/7Arkansas St134W90-65
11/11@Rice245W81-69
11/14Abilene Chr222W76-66
11/18@Fresno St159L80-78
11/21@Pepperdine279W63-60
11/29@UT Arlington143L66-61
12/3UTRGV218W73-60
12/7ULM352W96-76
12/17TAM C. Christi191W69-60
12/29@East Texas A&M306W75-48
12/31@Northwestern LA289W74-64
1/3@SE Louisiana260W73-63
1/5@McNeese St73L66-64
1/10Houston Chr302W85-67
1/12Incarnate Word19080%
1/17@New Orleans23869%
1/19@Nicholls St19261%
1/24@Lamar22467%
1/26Northwestern LA28991%
1/31SE Louisiana26089%
2/2McNeese St7349%
2/7Lamar22484%
2/9East Texas A&M30693%
2/14@UTRGV21865%
2/16@TAM C. Christi19161%
2/21Nicholls St19280%
2/23New Orleans23885%
2/28@Houston Chr30281%
3/2@Incarnate Word19061%